Google to Sign EU’s Voluntary AI Code Despite Concerns Over Innovation Risks

Alphabet-owned Google has agreed to sign the European Union’s new voluntary AI Code of Practice, a framework aimed at helping companies align with the bloc’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). This move was confirmed by Kent Walker, Google’s Global Affairs President, in a blog post released Wednesday. The code was designed by 13 independent experts to offer legal clarity on AI development, especially for general-purpose AI models.

The code encourages companies to disclose summaries of training data and ensure they comply with EU copyright laws, which are crucial under the AI Act. Though voluntary, the code is seen as an important step toward setting industry standards in a rapidly evolving AI landscape. Google’s participation reflects both a commitment to regulatory cooperation and an effort to stay engaged in Europe’s AI ecosystem.

Despite signing, Google expressed reservations about the code’s impact on innovation. Walker warned that certain provisions—such as those potentially revealing trade secrets, slowing approvals, or diverging from established copyright law—could hinder AI development in Europe. These issues, he said, may jeopardize the continent’s global competitiveness in artificial intelligence.

Other tech giants have reacted differently. Microsoft is expected to sign the code soon, according to its president Brad Smith. In contrast, Meta Platforms has opted out, citing legal uncertainties for model developers under the current framework. The mixed reactions from industry leaders highlight the ongoing tension between innovation and regulation in the AI space.

The EU’s AI regulations aim to set a global standard for responsible AI use, especially as the technology becomes increasingly integrated into business and daily life. The code and the AI Act are part of broader efforts to establish ethical boundaries and oversight mechanisms in a space currently dominated by the United States and China. While Google’s signature lends credibility to the EU’s initiative, the debate over how to balance transparency, innovation, and competitiveness remains unresolved.

Source: Reuters