Former U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a controversial plan for the Gaza Strip, suggesting that the United States should take control of the territory while relocating its Palestinian residents to other countries. Trump presented this idea during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing Gaza as a “demolition site” and envisioning its transformation into a prosperous region under U.S. oversight. This marks a significant departure from previous American policies, which have traditionally supported a two-state solution.
The proposal has drawn immediate backlash from various international actors, including U.S. lawmakers, global allies, and human rights organizations. Trump’s suggestion to resettle Palestinians in neighboring countries has been widely condemned, with many pointing out that such a move would violate international law. Netanyahu refrained from directly commenting on the plan but acknowledged Trump’s ability to “think outside the box.” Critics have raised concerns about the feasibility of a U.S.-controlled Gaza and the potential for prolonged military involvement.
Trump has compared his vision for Gaza to a “Riviera of the Middle East,” suggesting that the U.S. could clear weapons from the area and create jobs. However, he did not specify the legal or logistical framework for assuming control of Gaza or explain how the relocation of over two million Palestinians would be carried out. Given the region’s history of conflict and previous U.S. reluctance to deploy troops there, experts warn that the plan could lead to further instability.
The proposal also threatens to disrupt ongoing U.S. diplomatic efforts in the Middle East, particularly the normalization talks between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Many analysts fear that such rhetoric could embolden rival powers like Russia and China, who may use it to justify their own territorial ambitions. Furthermore, comparisons have been drawn to past U.S. interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, raising concerns about potential military entanglements.
Trump’s idea is part of a broader pattern of controversial geopolitical statements since his return to office. In recent weeks, he has also made remarks about acquiring Greenland, reasserting control over the Panama Canal, and even making Canada the 51st U.S. state. While he presents these ideas as strategic and economic opportunities, critics argue that they reflect outdated imperialist thinking that could strain U.S. foreign relations.
Source: BUSINESS DAY