Trump Lawyer Rudy Giuliani Joins Pa. Court Case Seeking To Deny Biden Victory After Other Attorneys Quit

President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, on Tuesday was allowed to join a lawsuit seeking to stop Pennsylvania from certifying election results expected to confirm a projected victory for President-elect Joe Biden.

Giuliani’s last-minute request to have a federal judge admit him to the case came hours before a hearing in the case, and after two sets of other lawyers for Trump’s reelection campaign quit the case over the past week.

It also came after U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann denied a request by another new attorney for the campaign to postpone the hearing, which is set for 1:30 p.m. ET.

A former New York City mayor and federal prosecutor, Giuliani is not admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania federal court, so he needed permission from Brann to appear in the case.

Giuliani’s application said that he is “currently a member in good standing” of a number of state and federal courts, and of the District of Columbia Bar.

However, a check of the DC Bar’s registry shows that Giuliani’s admission there is administratively suspended because of non-payment of fees. That suspension likely would have no affect on his admission to the Pennsylvania case.

On the same day that Biden was projected as winner of the election, Giuliani led a widely panned press conference about the vote counting process outside of Four Seasons Total Landscaping, a small business in Philadelphia located between a crematorium and a sex shop.

Trump originally announced that the presser would be held at the “Four Seasons,” the name of an upscale hotel, before pointing out the actual location in a subsequent tweet.

Speaking at a lectern set up in the rear parking lot of the landscaping business, Giuliani assailed the city of Philadelphia for having a “sad history” of voter fraud, and scoffed at journalists when they told him that news outlets had called the race for Biden.

Trump last week said that the New York-based Giuliani would lead his campaign’s efforts in multiple states to challenge ballots and reverse Biden’s victory.

Those efforts so far have come to naught. Legal and election analysts have said Trump appears to have little, if any chance of winning enough cases, in enough states, to invalidate enough ballots to win a second term in the White House.

Next Monday is the deadline for Pennsylvania county boards of elections to file their returns with the state secretary of state.

During an interview Tuesday on Fox Business, Giuliani claimed that the Pennsylvania case hinges on 700,000 ballots that he alleged “were counted surreptitiously.”

“Frankly, that is a case that we would like to see get to the Supreme Court,” he said.

Giuliani also said “we’re probably gonna sue in at least eight or nine” states where Republican ballot watchers allegedly were blocked from observing the vote tallying processing.

“The only remedy the court has is to just cancel out those votes,” he said.

“I believe we have amassed more than enough evidence in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, and Georgia,” he said when asked if there are enough questionable ballots to overturn Biden’s victory.

“I believe we’re very close in Nevada.”

But the new attorney for Trump’s campaign in the Pennsylvania lawsuit, Marc Scaringi, who is also a talk-radio host, had said on his show on Nov. 7 before joining the team that attempts to reverse Biden’s projected electoral victory “will not work.”

That was the same day that NBC News and other media outlets called the national election for Biden, after they projected he would win Pennsylvania’s 20 Electoral College votes.

The lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania alleges that a number counties evaluated mail-ballots on an “entirely parallel track to those ballots cast in person.”

It also claims that a number of Democrat-heavy counties illegally reviewed mail-in ballots earlier than they should have, which gave voters there extra time to “cure” problems with their ballots.

On Sunday, the Trump campaign amended its complaint, abandoning a claim that election officials in certain counties had blocked some observers from watching ballots being counted.

Less than a week before Tuesday’s hearing, lawyers on the Trump campaign’s team from Porter Wright Morris & Arthur had withdrawn from the case.

“Plaintiffs and Porter Wright have reached a mutual agreement that plaintiffs will be best served if Porter Wright withdraws,” those lawyers said in a court filing.

On Monday, three more lawyers asked the judge to let them leave the case.

The judge, Brann, granted the request for two of them — John Scott and Douglas Hughes, both of whom are based in Texas.

But the judge was silent on the request to withdraw by Linda Kerns, a Philadelphia-based attorney whose practice previously specialized in family law matters.

Scaringi, the attorney who also has a radio show, then joined the Trump campaign’s legal team.

Hours later, Scaringi asked Brann to reschedule Tuesday’s oral arguments, as well as an evidentiary hearing set for Thursday.

“Having only been retained today, Plaintiffs’ new counsel need additional time to adequately prepare this case for the upcoming oral argument and evidentiary hearing,” Scaringi wrote in a court filing.

“Furthermore, this is a case of significant complexity and importance to the people of the United States of America,” Scaringi wrote.

Brann promptly denied the request.

“Counsel for the parties are expected to be prepared for argument and questioning,” the judge wrote in an order Monday night.

– CNBC